Re: [Patch 4/5] Network Drop Monitor: Adding drop monitor implementation & Netlink protocol

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Patrick McHardy
Date: Thursday, April 2, 2009 - 8:14 am

Herbert Xu wrote:

I'd prefer that as well. The only reason to do this is to save a few
bytes and cycles for attribute encapsulation. I don't think this
matters at all, judging by the fact that I've never seen a userspace
implementation using message batching, the current users don't seem
to care about performance *that* much.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [Patch 4/5] Network Drop Monitor: Adding drop monitor ..., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Tue Mar 3, 11:19 am)
Re: [Patch 4/5] Network Drop Monitor: Adding drop monitor ..., Patrick McHardy, (Thu Apr 2, 8:14 am)