Re: TCP: Peer messages

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ilpo Järvinen
Date: Sunday, April 19, 2009 - 4:19 am

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Stephen Hemminger wrote:


This is what was earlier the Treason uncloacked message until somebody 
was scared to death because of it and we had to change the wording.

And it's what the old kernels do for us (and there are plenty of such 
kernels around), and possibly broken middleboxes too. Unless you have a 
tcpdump of a specific case or can clearly say that its frequency is much 
larger than it used to be in some between kernel versions consistent test 
setup, I'm not going to waste my time on debugging obsolete remote ends.

But, now that I think it a bit more, we could possibly but a WARN_ON 
somewhere if we ever sent past advertized window to make a distinction 
between our and their bugs.

-- 
 i.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
TCP: Peer messages, Stephen Hemminger, (Sat Apr 18, 6:03 pm)
Re: TCP: Peer messages, Ilpo Järvinen, (Sun Apr 19, 4:19 am)
Re: TCP: Peer messages, Stephen Hemminger, (Sun Apr 19, 8:11 pm)