Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 04:54:00PM CEST, shemminger@vyatta.com wrote:
quoted text
>> +static int another_port_has_addr(const struct net_bridge_port *p,
>> +				 struct net_bridge_fdb_entry *f)
>> +{
>> +	struct net_bridge *br = p->br;
>> +	struct net_bridge_port *op;
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry(op, &br->port_list, list) {
>> +		if (op != p && is_dev_addr(op->dev, f->addr.addr)) {
>> +			f->dst = op;
>> +			return 1;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>
>Forwarding database is hot path, people sometimes run lots of devices
>on single bridge, doesn't this scale worse?
>
This only puts the original loop code to the function, so if compiler decides to
inline this there might be no difference.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html