Re: [net-next PATCH v3] igbvf: add new driver to support 82576 virtual functions

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alexander Duyck
Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 - 5:54 pm

David Miller wrote:

Thanks for allowing me more time, but the issue isn't the igbvf driver. 
  The part that Stephen is referencing will be an issue in the igb 
driver.  That is why I pointed him to 
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/23471/ since it is the part that 
contains the code that he has issues with.

Since the issue isn't the igbvf driver there is no reason for it to be 
held up.  If you want to revert the offending patch feel free to and 
what I will do is send a patch out that just statically set the number 
of VFs to 7 if the kernel and device supports enabling SR-IOV.  I didn't 
want to take that approach since it means that it disables multi-queue 
for igb on those devices but I feel like I have been backed into a 
corner on this and don't have many other options.

Thanks,

Alex











--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [net-next PATCH v3] igbvf: add new driver to support 8 ..., Stephen Hemminger, (Wed Mar 25, 3:03 pm)
Re: [net-next PATCH v3] igbvf: add new driver to support 8 ..., Alexander Duyck, (Wed Mar 25, 5:54 pm)