Re: [patch 0/6] s390: qeth fixes for 2.6.30

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Frank Blaschka
Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 - 1:25 am

> Any particular reason you wait until right when the

Sorry, this was by accident. Next time I will send the patches
sooner.


I did not wrote the EDDP code but this was my impression too. Thanks for
confirming my study. Also the filling of the hardware buffers was not
efficient and passing more buffers to the hw was expensive too.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 0/6] s390: qeth fixes for 2.6.30, frank.blaschka, (Tue Mar 24, 11:57 pm)
Re: [patch 0/6] s390: qeth fixes for 2.6.30, David Miller, (Wed Mar 25, 12:08 am)
Re: [patch 0/6] s390: qeth fixes for 2.6.30, Frank Blaschka, (Wed Mar 25, 1:25 am)
Re: [patch 0/6] s390: qeth fixes for 2.6.30, David Miller, (Wed Mar 25, 4:47 pm)