Eric Dumazet a écrit :
quoted text
> Joakim Tjernlund a écrit :
>> Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> wrote on 24/03/2009 10:12:53:
>>> Joakim Tjernlund a écrit :
>>>> Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote on 23/03/2009 18:49:15:
>>>>> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>>>>>> Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote on 23/03/2009 13:29:33:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is no /proc/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack. There is a
>>>>>>>> /proc/net/nf_conntrack though and it is empty. If I telnet
>>>>>>>> to the board I see:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That means that something is leaking conntrack references, most 
>>>> likely
>>>>>>> by leaking skbs. Since I haven't seen any other reports, my guess 
>>>> would
>>>>>>> be the ucc_geth driver.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mucking around with the ucc_geth driver I found that if I:
>>>>>>  - Move TX from IRQ to NAPI context
>>>>>>  - double the weight.
>>>>>>  - after booting up, wait a few mins until the JFFS2 GC kernel 
>> thread 
>>>> has 
>>>>>> stopped
>>>>>>    scanning the FS 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then the "nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet." msgs stops.
>>>>>> Does this seem right to you guys?
>>>>> No. As I said, something seems to be leaking packets. You should be
>>>>> able to confirm that by checking the sk_buff slabs in /proc/slabinfo.
>>>>> If that *doesn't* show any signs of a leak, please run "conntrack -E"
>>>>> to capture the conntrack events before the "table full" message
>>>>> appears and post the output.
>>>> skbuff does not differ much, but others do
>>>>
>>>> Before ping:
>>>>   skbuff_fclone_cache    0      0    352   11    1 : tunables   54 27 
>> 0 
>>>> : slabdata      0      0      0
>>>>   skbuff_head_cache     20     20    192   20    1 : tunables  120 60 
>> 0 
>>>> : slabdata      1      1      0
>>>>   size-64              731    767     64   59    1 : tunables  120 60 
>> 0 
>>>> : slabdata     13     13      0
>>>>   nf_conntrack          10     19    208   19    1 : tunables  120 60 
>> 0 
>>>> : slabdata      1      1      0
>>>>
>>>> During ping: 
>>>>   skbuff_fclone_cache    0      0    352   11    1 : tunables   54 27 
>> 0 
>>>> : slabdata      0      0      0
>>>>   skbuff_head_cache     40     40    192   20    1 : tunables  120 60 
>> 0 
>>>> : slabdata      2      2      0
>>>>   size-64             8909   8909     64   59    1 : tunables  120 60 
>> 0 
>>>> : slabdata    151    151      0
>>>>   nf_conntrack        5111   5111    208   19    1 : tunables  120 60 
>> 0 
>>>> : slabdata    269    269      0
>>>>
>>>> This feels more like the freeing of conntrack objects are delayed and 
>>>> builds up when ping flooding.
>>>>
>>>> Don't have "conntrack -E" for my embedded board so that will have to 
>> wait 
>>>> a bit longer.
>>> I dont understand how your ping can use so many conntrack entries...
>>>
>>> Then, as I said yesterday, I believe you have a RCU delay, because of
>>> a misbehaving driver or something...
>>>
>>> grep RCU .config
>> grep RCU .config
>> # RCU Subsystem
>> CONFIG_CLASSIC_RCU=y
>> # CONFIG_TREE_RCU is not set
>> # CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU is not set
>> # CONFIG_TREE_RCU_TRACE is not set
>> # CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU_TRACE is not set
>> # CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST is not set
>> # CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR is not set
>>
>>> grep CONFIG_SMP .config
>> grep CONFIG_SMP .config
>> # CONFIG_SMP is not set
>>
>>> You could change qhimark from 10000 to 1000 in kernel/rcuclassic.c (line 
>> 80)
>>> as a workaround. It should force a quiescent state after 1000 freed 
>> conntracks.
>>
>> right, doing this almost killed all conntrack messages, had to stress it 
>> pretty
>> hard before I saw handful "nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet"
>>
>> RCU is not my cup of tea, do you have any ideas were to look?
> 
> In a stress situation, you feed more deleted conntracks to call_rcu() than
> the blimit (10 real freeing per RCU softirq invocation). 
> 
> So with default qhimark being 10000, this means about 10000 conntracks
> can sit in RCU (per CPU) before being really freed.
> 
> Only when hitting 10000, RCU enters a special mode to free all queued items, instead
> of a small batch of 10
> 
> To solve your problem we can :
> 
> 1) reduce qhimark from 10000 to 1000 (for example)
>    Probably should be done to reduce some spikes in RCU code when freeing
>    whole 10000 elements...
> OR
> 2) change conntrack tunable (max conntrack entries on your machine)
> OR
> 3) change net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c to decrement net->ct.count
>   in nf_conntrack_free() instead of callback.
> 
> [PATCH] conntrack: Reduce conntrack count in nf_conntrack_free()
> 
> We use RCU to defer freeing of conntrack structures. In DOS situation, RCU might
> accumulate about 10.000 elements per CPU in its internal queues. To get accurate
> conntrack counts (at the expense of slightly more RAM used), we might consider
> conntrack counter not taking into account "about to be freed elements, waiting
> in RCU queues". We thus decrement it in nf_conntrack_free(), not in the RCU
> callback.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
> 
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> index f4935e3..6478dc7 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> @@ -516,16 +516,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_alloc);
>  static void nf_conntrack_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
>  {
>  	struct nf_conn *ct = container_of(head, struct nf_conn, rcu);
> -	struct net *net = nf_ct_net(ct);
>  
>  	nf_ct_ext_free(ct);
>  	kmem_cache_free(nf_conntrack_cachep, ct);
> -	atomic_dec(&net->ct.count);
>  }
>  
>  void nf_conntrack_free(struct nf_conn *ct)
>  {
> +	struct net *net = nf_ct_net(ct);
> +
>  	nf_ct_ext_destroy(ct);
> +	atomic_dec(&net->ct.count);
>  	call_rcu(&ct->rcu, nf_conntrack_free_rcu);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_free);

I forgot to say this is what we do for 'struct file' freeing as well. We
decrement nr_files in file_free(), not in file_free_rcu()

static inline void file_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
{
        struct file *f = container_of(head, struct file, f_u.fu_rcuhead);

        put_cred(f->f_cred);
        kmem_cache_free(filp_cachep, f);
}

static inline void file_free(struct file *f)
{
        percpu_counter_dec(&nr_files);      <<<< HERE >>>>
        file_check_state(f);
        call_rcu(&f->f_u.fu_rcuhead, file_free_rcu);
}



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html