Joakim Tjernlund a écrit :
quoted text
> Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote on 23/03/2009 18:49:15:
>> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>>> Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote on 23/03/2009 13:29:33:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> There is no /proc/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack. There is a
>>>>> /proc/net/nf_conntrack though and it is empty. If I telnet
>>>>> to the board I see:
>>>>>
>>>> That means that something is leaking conntrack references, most 
> likely
>>>> by leaking skbs. Since I haven't seen any other reports, my guess 
> would
>>>> be the ucc_geth driver.
>>>>
>>> Mucking around with the ucc_geth driver I found that if I:
>>>  - Move TX from IRQ to NAPI context
>>>  - double the weight.
>>>  - after booting up, wait a few mins until the JFFS2 GC kernel thread 
> has 
>>> stopped
>>>    scanning the FS 
>>>
>>> Then the "nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet." msgs stops.
>>> Does this seem right to you guys?
>> No. As I said, something seems to be leaking packets. You should be
>> able to confirm that by checking the sk_buff slabs in /proc/slabinfo.
>> If that *doesn't* show any signs of a leak, please run "conntrack -E"
>> to capture the conntrack events before the "table full" message
>> appears and post the output.
> 
> skbuff does not differ much, but others do
> 
> Before ping:
>   skbuff_fclone_cache    0      0    352   11    1 : tunables   54   27 0 
> : slabdata      0      0      0
>   skbuff_head_cache     20     20    192   20    1 : tunables  120   60 0 
> : slabdata      1      1      0
>   size-64              731    767     64   59    1 : tunables  120   60 0 
> : slabdata     13     13      0
>   nf_conntrack          10     19    208   19    1 : tunables  120   60 0 
> : slabdata      1      1      0
> 
> During ping: 
>   skbuff_fclone_cache    0      0    352   11    1 : tunables   54   27 0 
> : slabdata      0      0      0
>   skbuff_head_cache     40     40    192   20    1 : tunables  120   60 0 
> : slabdata      2      2      0
>   size-64             8909   8909     64   59    1 : tunables  120   60 0 
> : slabdata    151    151      0
>   nf_conntrack        5111   5111    208   19    1 : tunables  120   60 0 
> : slabdata    269    269      0
> 
> This feels more like the freeing of conntrack objects are delayed and 
> builds up when ping flooding.
> 
> Don't have "conntrack -E" for my embedded board so that will have to wait 
> a bit longer.

I dont understand how your ping can use so many conntrack entries...

Then, as I said yesterday, I believe you have a RCU delay, because of
a misbehaving driver or something...

grep RCU .config
grep CONFIG_SMP .config

You could change qhimark from 10000 to 1000 in kernel/rcuclassic.c (line 80)
as a workaround. It should force a quiescent state after 1000 freed conntracks.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html