From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:54:17 +0200 (EET)

quoted text
> We'll be dirty it anyway (not that I check), the first "real" statement
> in tcp_rcv_established is:
> 
> 	tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
> 
> ...that'll land on the same dword. :-/
> 
> I suppose the blocks are there just because they had more complexity 
> inside when they had to calculate the eff_sacks too (maybe it would
> have been better to just remove them in that drop-patch so you would
> have had less head-ache :-)).

That sounds like a good commit log entry for when you resubmit
this patch :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html