Re: TX time stamping

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Miller
Date: Thursday, March 19, 2009 - 2:05 pm

You still haven't done anything to address this fundamental issue with
your timestamping changes.  I've been more than patient enough.

It is also not anyone's obligation to help you fix this problem.
You want to add this new feature, whereas I do not consider it
essential in any way whatsoever.

So I am going to have to revert this work, since it appears that being
able to get at skb->sk after the transmit function runs was an
essential requirement to how your code works.

And that will simply never ever work.

This is why I tried to wait a long time to integrate these patches in
the first place, I'd had hoped that you had worked out all of these
kinds of issues during that time.

Instead, we have a half-working turd in a tree, and I'm removing it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
TX time stamping, Patrick Ohly, (Tue Mar 3, 11:31 am)
Re: TX time stamping, David Miller, (Thu Mar 19, 2:05 pm)
Re: TX time stamping, Herbert Xu, (Thu Mar 19, 7:10 pm)
Re: TX time stamping, Patrick Ohly, (Wed Mar 25, 12:08 am)
Re: TX time stamping, Herbert Xu, (Thu Mar 26, 7:48 am)
Re: TX time stamping, Patrick Ohly, (Thu Mar 26, 8:30 am)
Re: TX time stamping, Oliver Hartkopp, (Mon Mar 30, 11:09 am)
Re: TX time stamping, Patrick Ohly, (Mon Mar 30, 11:53 pm)