Re: [PATCH] tun: Fix unicast filter overflow

Previous thread: [PATCH] netxen: fix msi-x interrupt handling by Dhananjay Phadke on Saturday, February 7, 2009 - 10:23 am. (2 messages)

Next thread: ***YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS WAS SELECTED*** by Compaq NEW YEAR PROMOTION on Saturday, February 7, 2009 - 6:50 pm. (1 message)
From: Alex Williamson
Date: Saturday, February 7, 2009 - 10:45 am

Tap devices can make use of a small MAC filter set via the
TUNSETTXFILTER ioctl.  The filter has a set of exact matches
plus a hash for imperfect filtering of additional multicast
addresses.  The current code is unbalanced, adding unicast
addresses to the multicast hash, but only checking the hash
against multicast addresses.  This results in the filter
dropping unicast addresses that overflow the exact filter.
The fix is simply to disable the filter by leaving count set
to zero if we find non-multicast addresses after the exact
match table is filled.

Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
---

Proposed for 2.6.29 and stable.

 drivers/net/tun.c |   10 ++++++++--
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
index d7b81e4..09fea31 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -157,10 +157,16 @@ static int update_filter(struct tap_filter *filter, void __user *arg)
 
 	nexact = n;
 
-	/* The rest is hashed */
+	/* Remaining multicast addresses are hashed,
+	 * unicast will leave the filter disabled. */
 	memset(filter->mask, 0, sizeof(filter->mask));
-	for (; n < uf.count; n++)
+	for (; n < uf.count; n++) {
+		if (!is_multicast_ether_addr(addr[n].u)) {
+			err = 0; /* no filter */
+			goto done;
+		}
 		addr_hash_set(filter->mask, addr[n].u);
+	}
 
 	/* For ALLMULTI just set the mask to all ones.
 	 * This overrides the mask populated above. */

--

From: David Miller
Date: Sunday, February 8, 2009 - 6:06 pm

From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>

Doesn't it make more sense to remove the multicast check
in the filter check function?

With your change, the user gets absolutely no indication
that filtering has been completely disabled simply because
they put too many unicast addresses into the filter.  We
just return zero, that's crazy.
--

From: Alex Williamson
Date: Sunday, February 8, 2009 - 6:43 pm

Sure, that's another option, but we'd then need to figure out what to do
with TUN_FLT_ALLMULTI.  Unicast would almost needs it's own hash list if
we want to support an allmulti mode that's less than promiscuous.  The
return value of the ioctl is the number of exact filters, so the user
will know what happened.  Thanks,

Alex


--

From: David Miller
Date: Sunday, February 8, 2009 - 6:48 pm

From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>

Oh so that's what the return value means.

Ok, I guess for now your patch is fine, I'll apply it and
queue it up for -stable, thanks!

--

Previous thread: [PATCH] netxen: fix msi-x interrupt handling by Dhananjay Phadke on Saturday, February 7, 2009 - 10:23 am. (2 messages)

Next thread: ***YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS WAS SELECTED*** by Compaq NEW YEAR PROMOTION on Saturday, February 7, 2009 - 6:50 pm. (1 message)