Home » Mailing list archives » linux-netdev » 2009 » February » 19

Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Herbert Xu
Subject: Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5
Date: Thursday, February 19, 2009 - 6:32 am

Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com> wrote:

OK we should definitely fix that.

Thanks,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, Andrey Borzenkov, (Tue Feb 17, 10:01 am)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, Andrey Borzenkov, (Tue Feb 17, 11:17 am)
Re: [Bonding-devel] 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV ..., Jay Vosburgh, (Tue Feb 17, 1:08 pm)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, Brian Haley, (Tue Feb 17, 1:10 pm)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, Thomas Backlund, (Tue Feb 17, 1:56 pm)
Re: [Bonding-devel] 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV ..., Jay Vosburgh, (Tue Feb 17, 2:06 pm)
Re: [Bonding-devel] 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV ..., Brian Haley, (Tue Feb 17, 2:49 pm)
Re: [Bonding-devel] 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV ..., Jay Vosburgh, (Tue Feb 17, 3:24 pm)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, David Miller, (Tue Feb 17, 3:29 pm)
Re: [Bonding-devel] 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV ..., Nicolas de Pesloüan, (Tue Feb 17, 3:30 pm)
Re: [Bonding-devel] 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV ..., David Miller, (Tue Feb 17, 3:49 pm)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, David Miller, (Tue Feb 17, 3:51 pm)
Re: [Bonding-devel] 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV ..., David Miller, (Tue Feb 17, 3:54 pm)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Tue Feb 17, 9:41 pm)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, David Miller, (Tue Feb 17, 10:29 pm)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, Roland Dreier, (Tue Feb 17, 10:55 pm)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, Frank Blaschka, (Tue Feb 17, 11:55 pm)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, Theodore Tso, (Wed Feb 18, 6:55 am)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, Chuck Lever, (Wed Feb 18, 9:24 am)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, Vlad Yasevich, (Wed Feb 18, 11:33 am)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, Brian Haley, (Wed Feb 18, 12:57 pm)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, John Dykstra, (Wed Feb 18, 2:21 pm)
Re: [Bonding-devel] 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV ..., Stephen Hemminger, (Wed Feb 18, 2:29 pm)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, David Miller, (Wed Feb 18, 3:14 pm)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, Vlad Yasevich, (Wed Feb 18, 6:11 pm)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, Herbert Xu, (Thu Feb 19, 6:29 am)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, Herbert Xu, (Thu Feb 19, 6:32 am)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, Randy Dunlap, (Thu Feb 19, 11:15 am)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, Andrey Borzenkov, (Thu Feb 19, 11:19 am)
Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5, Jay Vosburgh, (Thu Feb 19, 11:20 am)
Re: [Bonding-devel] 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Mar 4, 4:46 am)