Re: [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two critical loops in ip_packet_match()

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 - 9:33 am

Patrick McHardy a écrit :

I see, but #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS can help here ;)

ifname_compare() should be static in three files (ipv4_ip_tables, ipv6_ip_tables and arp_tables),
since only arp_tables variant has the alignement problem.

[PATCH] netfilter: unfold two critical loops in arp_packet_match()

x86 and powerpc can perform long word accesses in an efficient maner.
We can use this to unroll two loops in arp_packet_match(), to
perform arithmetic on long words instead of bytes. This is a win
on x86_64 for example.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
---
 net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c |   44 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
index 7ea88b6..b5db463 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
@@ -73,6 +73,36 @@ static inline int arp_devaddr_compare(const struct arpt_devaddr_info *ap,
 	return (ret != 0);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Unfortunatly, _b and _mask are not aligned to an int (or long int)
+ * Some arches dont care, unrolling the loop is a win on them.
+ */
+static unsigned long ifname_compare(const char *_a, const char *_b, const char *_mask)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
+	const unsigned long *a = (const unsigned long *)_a;
+	const unsigned long *b = (const unsigned long *)_b;
+	const unsigned long *mask = (const unsigned long *)_mask;
+	unsigned long ret;
+
+	ret = (a[0] ^ b[0]) & mask[0];
+	if (IFNAMSIZ > sizeof(unsigned long))
+		ret |= (a[1] ^ b[1]) & mask[1];
+	if (IFNAMSIZ > 2 * sizeof(unsigned long))
+		ret |= (a[2] ^ b[2]) & mask[2];
+	if (IFNAMSIZ > 3 * sizeof(unsigned long))
+		ret |= (a[3] ^ b[3]) & mask[3];
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(IFNAMSIZ > 4 * sizeof(unsigned long));
+#else
+	unsigned long ret = 0;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < IFNAMSIZ; i++)
+		ret |= (_a[i] ^ _b[i]) & _mask[i];
+#endif
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /* Returns whether packet matches rule or not. */
 static inline int arp_packet_match(const struct arphdr *arphdr,
 				   struct net_device *dev,
@@ -83,7 +113,7 @@ static inline int arp_packet_match(const struct arphdr *arphdr,
 	const char *arpptr = (char *)(arphdr + 1);
 	const char *src_devaddr, *tgt_devaddr;
 	__be32 src_ipaddr, tgt_ipaddr;
-	int i, ret;
+	long ret;
 
 #define FWINV(bool, invflg) ((bool) ^ !!(arpinfo->invflags & (invflg)))
 
@@ -156,10 +186,7 @@ static inline int arp_packet_match(const struct arphdr *arphdr,
 	}
 
 	/* Look for ifname matches.  */
-	for (i = 0, ret = 0; i < IFNAMSIZ; i++) {
-		ret |= (indev[i] ^ arpinfo->iniface[i])
-			& arpinfo->iniface_mask[i];
-	}
+	ret = ifname_compare(indev, arpinfo->iniface, arpinfo->iniface_mask);
 
 	if (FWINV(ret != 0, ARPT_INV_VIA_IN)) {
 		dprintf("VIA in mismatch (%s vs %s).%s\n",
@@ -168,10 +195,7 @@ static inline int arp_packet_match(const struct arphdr *arphdr,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	for (i = 0, ret = 0; i < IFNAMSIZ; i++) {
-		ret |= (outdev[i] ^ arpinfo->outiface[i])
-			& arpinfo->outiface_mask[i];
-	}
+	ret = ifname_compare(outdev, arpinfo->outiface, arpinfo->outiface_mask);
 
 	if (FWINV(ret != 0, ARPT_INV_VIA_OUT)) {
 		dprintf("VIA out mismatch (%s vs %s).%s\n",
@@ -221,7 +245,7 @@ unsigned int arpt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
 			   const struct net_device *out,
 			   struct xt_table *table)
 {
-	static const char nulldevname[IFNAMSIZ];
+	static const char nulldevname[IFNAMSIZ] __attribute__((aligned(sizeof(long))));
 	unsigned int verdict = NF_DROP;
 	const struct arphdr *arp;
 	bool hotdrop = false;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
32 core net-next stack/netfilter &quot;scaling&quot;, Rick Jones, (Mon Jan 26, 3:15 pm)
Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter &quot;scaling&quot;, Stephen Hemminger, (Mon Jan 26, 4:14 pm)
Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter &quot;scaling&quot;, Patrick McHardy, (Tue Jan 27, 2:15 am)
Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter &quot;scaling&quot;, Patrick McHardy, (Tue Jan 27, 4:37 am)
Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter &quot;scaling&quot;, Patrick McHardy, (Tue Jan 27, 10:33 am)
Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter &quot;scaling&quot;, Patrick McHardy, (Wed Jan 28, 9:25 am)
Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter &quot;scaling&quot;, Eric Dumazet, (Wed Jan 28, 10:07 am)
Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter &quot;scaling&quot;, Eric Dumazet, (Wed Jan 28, 10:34 am)
Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter &quot;scaling&quot;, Patrick McHardy, (Mon Feb 9, 7:57 am)
Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter &quot;scaling&quot;, Stephen Hemminger, (Tue Feb 10, 11:44 am)
Re: [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two critical loops in ip_pac ..., Eric Dumazet, (Wed Feb 18, 9:33 am)
[PATCH] netfilter: xt_physdev fixes, Eric Dumazet, (Wed Feb 18, 10:36 am)
Re: [PATCH] netfilter: xt_physdev fixes, Patrick McHardy, (Wed Feb 18, 11:14 am)
[PATCH] netfilter: unfold two loops in physdev_mt(), Eric Dumazet, (Thu Feb 19, 1:00 am)
Re: [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two loops in physdev_mt(), Patrick McHardy, (Thu Feb 19, 3:17 am)