Better?
-------------------->8----------------8<-----------------------
With while (x++ < n) { ... } x can reach n+1.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/3c505.c | 4 ++--
drivers/net/irda/mcs7780.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/3c505.c b/drivers/net/3c505.c
index 6124605..fb74846 100644
--- a/drivers/net/3c505.c
+++ b/drivers/net/3c505.c
@@ -500,9 +500,9 @@ static bool receive_pcb(struct net_device *dev, pcb_struct * pcb)
pcb->data.raw[i++] = inb_command(dev->base_addr);
if (i > MAX_PCB_DATA)
INVALID_PCB_MSG(i);
- } while ((stat & ASF_PCB_MASK) != ASF_PCB_END && j < 20000);
+ } while ((stat & ASF_PCB_MASK) != ASF_PCB_END && j <= 20000);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->lock, flags);
- if (j >= 20000) {
+ if (j > 20000) {
TIMEOUT_MSG(__LINE__);
return false;
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/irda/mcs7780.c b/drivers/net/irda/mcs7780.c
index 7eafdca..b4f4f19 100644
--- a/drivers/net/irda/mcs7780.c
+++ b/drivers/net/irda/mcs7780.c
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static int mcs_speed_change(struct mcs_cb *mcs)
mcs_get_reg(mcs, MCS_RESV_REG, &rval);
} while(cnt++ < 100 && (rval & MCS_IRINTX));
- if(cnt >= 100) {
+ if(cnt > 100) {
IRDA_ERROR("unable to change speed\n");
ret = -EIO;
goto error;
--
i is also misused here and array can be overriden, so additional break/return is needed. Thanks, --
Thanks, is this how it should be?
-------------------->8----------------8<-----------------------
With while (x++ < n) { ... } x can reach n+1. As Jarek Poplawski pointed out, array
pcb->data.raw was not correctly used.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/3c505.c b/drivers/net/3c505.c
index 6124605..4cf3050 100644
--- a/drivers/net/3c505.c
+++ b/drivers/net/3c505.c
@@ -497,12 +497,15 @@ static bool receive_pcb(struct net_device *dev, pcb_struct * pcb)
do {
j = 0;
while (((stat = get_status(dev->base_addr)) & ACRF) == 0 && j++ < 20000);
- pcb->data.raw[i++] = inb_command(dev->base_addr);
- if (i > MAX_PCB_DATA)
- INVALID_PCB_MSG(i);
- } while ((stat & ASF_PCB_MASK) != ASF_PCB_END && j < 20000);
+ pcb->data.raw[i] = inb_command(dev->base_addr);
+ } while (++i < MAX_PCB_DATA && (stat & ASF_PCB_MASK) != ASF_PCB_END && j <= 20000);
+
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->lock, flags);
- if (j >= 20000) {
+ if (i >= MAX_PCB_DATA) {
+ INVALID_PCB_MSG(i);
+ return false;
+ }
+ if (j > 20000) {
TIMEOUT_MSG(__LINE__);
return false;
}
--
It looks (almost) OK to me. :-) Except this > 80 line. On the other hand, I wonder if it's not a good time to make it more readable; I mean the first while (): length, ";", and maybe ++j similarly to i now? BTW, I hope you remember about irda. --
Thanks again for reviewing, how's this? with irda this time.
-------------------->8----------------8<-----------------------
With while (x++ < n) { ... } x can reach n+1. As Jarek Poplawski pointed out, array
pcb->data.raw was not correctly used.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/3c505.c b/drivers/net/3c505.c
index 6124605..4ade64a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/3c505.c
+++ b/drivers/net/3c505.c
@@ -493,15 +493,21 @@ static bool receive_pcb(struct net_device *dev, pcb_struct * pcb)
}
/* read the data */
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->lock, flags);
- i = 0;
- do {
- j = 0;
- while (((stat = get_status(dev->base_addr)) & ACRF) == 0 && j++ < 20000);
- pcb->data.raw[i++] = inb_command(dev->base_addr);
- if (i > MAX_PCB_DATA)
- INVALID_PCB_MSG(i);
- } while ((stat & ASF_PCB_MASK) != ASF_PCB_END && j < 20000);
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_PCB_DATA; i++) {
+ for (j = 0; j < 20000; j++) {
+ stat = get_status(dev->base_addr);
+ if (stat & ACRF)
+ break;
+ }
+ pcb->data.raw[i] = inb_command(dev->base_addr);
+ if (stat & ASF_PCB_MASK == ASF_PCB_END || j >= 20000)
+ break;
+ }
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->lock, flags);
+ if (i >= MAX_PCB_DATA) {
+ INVALID_PCB_MSG(i);
+ return false;
+ }
if (j >= 20000) {
TIMEOUT_MSG(__LINE__);
return false;
diff --git a/drivers/net/irda/mcs7780.c b/drivers/net/irda/mcs7780.c
index 7eafdca..85e88da 100644
--- a/drivers/net/irda/mcs7780.c
+++ b/drivers/net/irda/mcs7780.c
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static int mcs_speed_change(struct mcs_cb *mcs)
mcs_get_reg(mcs, MCS_RESV_REG, &rval);
} while(cnt++ < 100 && (rval & MCS_IRINTX));
- if(cnt >= 100) {
+ if (cnt > 100) {
IRDA_ERROR("unable to change speed\n");
ret = -EIO;
goto error;
--
Hmm... except one bug: "stat & ..." needs "()"... Roel, please resend once more, but separated: something could go to stable, but not necessarily together. And add more description, especially to this 3c505 (here is more changes than 'while (x++ < n)'). Anyway, I hope David will like these "off by one" patches again, especially after this, and sun3lance one. Good catches! Cheers, --
... Here is no ++i after breaking the loop, so no need for [--i] later; please, check this more. --
Many thanks, Jarek,
Is this changelog ok?
------------------------------>8----------------8<------------------------------
Ensure that we do not set pcb->data.raw beyond its size, print an error message
and return false if we attempt to. A timout message was printed one too early.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/3c505.c b/drivers/net/3c505.c
index 6124605..a8107f9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/3c505.c
+++ b/drivers/net/3c505.c
@@ -493,21 +493,27 @@ static bool receive_pcb(struct net_device *dev, pcb_struct * pcb)
}
/* read the data */
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->lock, flags);
- i = 0;
- do {
- j = 0;
- while (((stat = get_status(dev->base_addr)) & ACRF) == 0 && j++ < 20000);
- pcb->data.raw[i++] = inb_command(dev->base_addr);
- if (i > MAX_PCB_DATA)
- INVALID_PCB_MSG(i);
- } while ((stat & ASF_PCB_MASK) != ASF_PCB_END && j < 20000);
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_PCB_DATA; i++) {
+ for (j = 0; j < 20000; j++) {
+ stat = get_status(dev->base_addr);
+ if (stat & ACRF)
+ break;
+ }
+ pcb->data.raw[i] = inb_command(dev->base_addr);
+ if ((stat & ASF_PCB_MASK) == ASF_PCB_END || j >= 20000)
+ break;
+ }
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->lock, flags);
+ if (i >= MAX_PCB_DATA) {
+ INVALID_PCB_MSG(i);
+ return false;
+ }
if (j >= 20000) {
TIMEOUT_MSG(__LINE__);
return false;
}
- /* woops, the last "data" byte was really the length! */
- total_length = pcb->data.raw[--i];
+ /* the last "data" byte was really the length! */
+ total_length = pcb->data.raw[i];
/* safety check total length vs data length */
if (total_length != (pcb->length + 2)) {
--
Yes, the changelog and patch look OK to me. Thanks, --
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com> Applied, thanks everyone. --
Ok, Here's for irda:
------------------------------>8----------------8<------------------------------
If no prior break occurs, cnt reaches 101 after the loop, so we are still able
to change speed when cnt has become 100.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/irda/mcs7780.c b/drivers/net/irda/mcs7780.c
index 7eafdca..85e88da 100644
--- a/drivers/net/irda/mcs7780.c
+++ b/drivers/net/irda/mcs7780.c
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static int mcs_speed_change(struct mcs_cb *mcs)
mcs_get_reg(mcs, MCS_RESV_REG, &rval);
} while(cnt++ < 100 && (rval & MCS_IRINTX));
- if(cnt >= 100) {
+ if (cnt > 100) {
IRDA_ERROR("unable to change speed\n");
ret = -EIO;
goto error;
--
From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com> Applied, thanks Roel. --
