Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Monday, November 30, 2009 - 5:46 am

On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 23:07 -0800, David Miller wrote:

If the problem is that the drivers are not portable, then this makes
sense.  However, as I understand it, the problem is that the same device
ids have been assigned to significantly different controllers/boards.
In this case it may be better for both of the drivers to claim the
device ids and to distinguish them at probe time.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Quantity is no substitute for quality, but it's the only one we've got.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
dmfe/tulip device id overlap, Brandon Philips, (Tue Nov 24, 9:36 pm)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, Brandon Philips, (Tue Nov 24, 9:49 pm)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, Ben Hutchings, (Wed Nov 25, 6:08 am)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, Grant Grundler, (Wed Nov 25, 10:24 am)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, David Miller, (Sun Nov 29, 1:30 am)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, Brandon Philips, (Sun Nov 29, 11:55 pm)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, David Miller, (Mon Nov 30, 12:07 am)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, Ben Hutchings, (Mon Nov 30, 5:46 am)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, Grant Grundler, (Mon Nov 30, 10:14 am)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, David Miller, (Mon Nov 30, 1:21 pm)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, David Miller, (Mon Nov 30, 1:26 pm)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, Brandon Philips, (Mon Nov 30, 3:22 pm)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, David Miller, (Mon Nov 30, 3:29 pm)