There is no reason for this lock to be reader/writer since
the reader only has lock held for a very brief period.
The overhead of read_lock is more expensive than spinlock.
Compile tested only, I am not a decnet user.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
--- a/net/decnet/dn_dev.c 2009-11-10 17:39:53.652984752 -0800
+++ b/net/decnet/dn_dev.c 2009-11-10 17:41:15.942736073 -0800
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ extern struct neigh_table dn_neigh_table
*/
__le16 decnet_address = 0;
-static DEFINE_RWLOCK(dndev_lock);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dndev_lock);
static struct net_device *decnet_default_device;
static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(dnaddr_chain);
@@ -557,7 +557,8 @@ rarok:
struct net_device *dn_dev_get_default(void)
{
struct net_device *dev;
- read_lock(&dndev_lock);
+
+ spin_lock(&dndev_lock);
dev = decnet_default_device;
if (dev) {
if (dev->dn_ptr)
@@ -565,7 +566,8 @@ struct net_device *dn_dev_get_default(vo
else
dev = NULL;
}
- read_unlock(&dndev_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&dndev_lock);
+
return dev;
}
@@ -575,13 +577,15 @@ int dn_dev_set_default(struct net_device
int rv = -EBUSY;
if (!dev->dn_ptr)
return -ENODEV;
- write_lock(&dndev_lock);
+
+ spin_lock(&dndev_lock);
if (force || decnet_default_device == NULL) {
old = decnet_default_device;
decnet_default_device = dev;
rv = 0;
}
- write_unlock(&dndev_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&dndev_lock);
+
if (old)
dev_put(old);
return rv;
@@ -589,13 +593,14 @@ int dn_dev_set_default(struct net_device
static void dn_dev_check_default(struct net_device *dev)
{
- write_lock(&dndev_lock);
+ spin_lock(&dndev_lock);
if (dev == decnet_default_device) {
decnet_default_device = NULL;
} else {
dev = NULL;
}
- write_unlock(&dndev_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&dndev_lock);
+
if (dev)
dev_put(dev);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html