[PATCH 0/2] Blackfin EMAC driver updates

Previous thread: [PATCH] gianfar: Fixup use of BUS_ID_SIZE by Kumar Gala on Wednesday, January 7, 2009 - 8:52 am. (2 messages)

Next thread: [PATCH 2/4] r6040: check PHY status when bringing interface up by Florian Fainelli on Wednesday, January 7, 2009 - 9:40 am. (2 messages)
From: Bryan Wu
Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2009 - 9:14 am

Hi Jeff,

Please take a look at these 2 patches for Blackfin EMAC driver

Thanks
-Bryan
--

From: Bryan Wu
Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2009 - 9:14 am

From: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>

Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/net/Kconfig |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/Kconfig b/drivers/net/Kconfig
index 9a18270..6b1eb43 100644
--- a/drivers/net/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/Kconfig
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ config ULTRA32
 
 config BFIN_MAC
 	tristate "Blackfin on-chip MAC support"
-	depends on NET_ETHERNET && (BF526 || BF527 || BF536 || BF537)
+	depends on NET_ETHERNET && (BF516 || BF518 || BF526 || BF527 || BF536 || BF537)
 	select CRC32
 	select MII
 	select PHYLIB
-- 
1.5.6

--

From: David Miller
Date: Thursday, January 8, 2009 - 11:52 am

From: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>

Applied.
--

From: Bryan Wu
Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2009 - 9:14 am

From: Graf Yang <graf.yang@analog.com>

Fill EMAC_VLAN1 with 0x8100 to admit 1522 long bytes frames. EMAC_VLAN2
seems need not use for now.

Signed-off-by: Graf Yang <graf.yang@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/net/bfin_mac.c |    8 ++++++++
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bfin_mac.c b/drivers/net/bfin_mac.c
index 78e31aa..15d7e62 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bfin_mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bfin_mac.c
@@ -517,6 +517,14 @@ void setup_system_regs(struct net_device *dev)
 
 	bfin_write_EMAC_MMC_CTL(RSTC | CROLL);
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q) || defined(CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q_MODULE)
+#define VLAN_ETHER_TYPE 0x8100
+	/* The legal length of the frame is increased to 1522 bytes */
+	bfin_write_EMAC_VLAN1(VLAN_ETHER_TYPE);
+	/* The legal length of the frame is increased to 1538 bytes */
+	/*bfin_write_EMAC_VLAN2(VLAN_ETHER_TYPE);*/
+#endif
+
 	/* Initialize the TX DMA channel registers */
 	bfin_write_DMA2_X_COUNT(0);
 	bfin_write_DMA2_X_MODIFY(4);
-- 
1.5.6

--

From: David Miller
Date: Thursday, January 8, 2009 - 11:55 am

From: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>

Please use ETH_P_8021Q from linux/if_ether.h instead of inventing

Please do not add code that is just going to be commented
out and not used.

Also, I disagree with the:

+#if defined(CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q) || defined(CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q_MODULE)

conditional.  Probably this part of the chip should be programmed
unconditionally.

We can get VLAN packets received and sent, using AF_PACKET
sockets, for example.  The chip should still respect those
even if VLAN proper is not being utilized.
--

From: Mike Frysinger
Date: Thursday, January 8, 2009 - 12:01 pm

again, more of a copy & paste ... this is how a bunch of drivers are

any tips on doing that ?

thanks for reviewing!
-mike
--

From: Mike Frysinger
Date: Thursday, January 8, 2009 - 12:05 pm

or rather, is there a driver or you two you can point out that is
doing this correctly ?  the ones i looked at seemed to be doing it
like the patch we posted ...
-mike
--

From: David Miller
Date: Thursday, January 8, 2009 - 12:30 pm

From: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@gmail.com>

And I disagree with how those drivers are doing it :-)

At least the programming of the chip to accept all packet
types properly, VLAN or not, regardless of kernel config,
is definitely IMHO the way to go.
--

From: Mike Frysinger
Date: Thursday, January 8, 2009 - 12:34 pm

i know on our side we all agree with you, we just didnt (dont) know
any better ;)
-mike
--

From: David Miller
Date: Thursday, January 8, 2009 - 12:29 pm

From: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@gmail.com>

No, sorry.
--

Previous thread: [PATCH] gianfar: Fixup use of BUS_ID_SIZE by Kumar Gala on Wednesday, January 7, 2009 - 8:52 am. (2 messages)

Next thread: [PATCH 2/4] r6040: check PHY status when bringing interface up by Florian Fainelli on Wednesday, January 7, 2009 - 9:40 am. (2 messages)