Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling"

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Patrick McHardy
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 - 2:15 am

Eric Dumazet wrote:

Thats an interesting test-case, but one lock per conntrack just for
TCP tracking seems like overkill. We're trying to keep the conntrack
stuctures as small as possible, so I'd prefer an array of spinlocks
or something like that.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling", Rick Jones, (Mon Jan 26, 3:15 pm)
Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling", Stephen Hemminger, (Mon Jan 26, 4:14 pm)
Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling", Patrick McHardy, (Tue Jan 27, 2:15 am)
Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling", Patrick McHardy, (Tue Jan 27, 4:37 am)
Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling", Patrick McHardy, (Tue Jan 27, 10:33 am)
Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling", Patrick McHardy, (Wed Jan 28, 9:25 am)
Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling", Eric Dumazet, (Wed Jan 28, 10:07 am)
Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling", Eric Dumazet, (Wed Jan 28, 10:34 am)
Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling", Patrick McHardy, (Mon Feb 9, 7:57 am)
Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling", Stephen Hemminger, (Tue Feb 10, 11:44 am)
[PATCH] netfilter: xt_physdev fixes, Eric Dumazet, (Wed Feb 18, 10:36 am)
Re: [PATCH] netfilter: xt_physdev fixes, Patrick McHardy, (Wed Feb 18, 11:14 am)
[PATCH] netfilter: unfold two loops in physdev_mt(), Eric Dumazet, (Thu Feb 19, 1:00 am)
Re: [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two loops in physdev_mt(), Patrick McHardy, (Thu Feb 19, 3:17 am)