Hi,

On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:12:47 -0800 Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.c=
om> wrote:
quoted text
>
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 13:29 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> >=20
> > I haven't published my net-next-2.6 tree at all, because
> > Stephen Rothwell hasn't stated that such content is
> > OK yet for his -next tree.
>=20
> I thought Stephen had stated that anytime _after_ -rc1 was released was
> OK for new material destined for the next release.
>=20
> If you're waiting for an explicit OK, I don't think it will forthcoming.

Here it is: "OK".  :-)

Yeah any time after -rc1 is fine.  I thought -rc2 would be better, but
Andrew beat me into submission :-)  (I suspect he suffers more from that
decision then I do).

It also has the advantage of ruining LCA for you all. :-)
--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/