On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 05:46:23PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:I think I can speak with some measure of confidence for at least the OLTP-testing part of my company when I say that I have no objection to Nick's planned merge scheme. I believe the kernel benchmark group have also done some testing with SLQB and have generally positive things to say about it (Yanmin added to the gargantuan cc). Did slabtop get fixed to work with SLQB? -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Frans Pop | top displaying 9999% CPU usage |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Chuck Ebbert | Why do so many machines need "noapic"? |
| Andy Whitcroft | clam |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Christoph Lameter | Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 |
