Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Friday, September 5, 2008 - 4:04 am

* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:


i guess CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_TIMERS=y is practical, and 
CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST=y would be nice as well - it can catch memory 
corruptions rather early and is relatively light-weight.

[ and if there's any reproducability of the corruption and if it happens 
  at a stable kernel address then a small custom hack in ftrace can 
  catch it the moment it happens. ]

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3, Andrew Morton, (Thu Sep 4, 10:45 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Sep 4, 11:05 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3, Andrew Morton, (Thu Sep 4, 11:34 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3, Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Sep 4, 1:31 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3, Andrew Morton, (Thu Sep 4, 1:41 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3, Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Sep 4, 2:03 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3, Andrew Morton, (Thu Sep 4, 3:22 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3, Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Sep 4, 3:45 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Sep 4, 4:17 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3, Andrew Morton, (Thu Sep 4, 4:17 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Sep 4, 4:25 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3, Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Sep 4, 4:27 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3, Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Sep 4, 10:39 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Sep 5, 4:04 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3, Andrew Morton, (Fri Sep 5, 10:49 am)