Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Monday, September 22, 2008 - 5:14 pm

> It is not an invalid estimate even in the NAT case, 

Typical case: you got a large company network behind a NAT.
First user has a very crappy wireless connection behind a slow
intercontinental link talking to the outgoing NAT router. He connectes to 
your internet server first and the window, slow start etc. parameters 
for him are saved in the dst_entry.  

The next guy behind the same NAT is in the same building
as the router who connects the company to the internet. He
has a much faster line. He connects to the same server. 
They will share the same dst and inetpeer entries.

The parameters saved earlier for the same IP are clearly invalid
for the second case. The link characteristics are completely 
different.

Also did you know there are there are whole countries behind
NAT. e.g. I was told that all of Saudi Arabia only comes from
a small handfull of IP addresses. It would surprise me if 
all of KSA has the same link characteristics? @)

Ah I see there's a sysctl now to disable this. How about
setting it by default?

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Christopher Snook, (Mon Sep 8, 2:56 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Rick Jones, (Mon Sep 8, 3:39 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Andi Kleen, (Mon Sep 8, 3:55 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Mon Sep 8, 10:10 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Mon Sep 8, 10:17 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Mon Sep 8, 10:22 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Mon Sep 8, 10:56 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Mon Sep 8, 11:02 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Evgeniy Polyakov, (Mon Sep 8, 11:22 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Mon Sep 8, 11:28 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Mark Brown, (Tue Sep 9, 3:31 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 5:05 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Mark Brown, (Tue Sep 9, 5:09 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 5:19 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Tue Sep 9, 6:00 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Andi Kleen, (Tue Sep 9, 7:36 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Rick Jones, (Tue Sep 9, 9:33 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chuck Lever, (Tue Sep 9, 9:54 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Tue Sep 9, 10:21 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Rick Jones, (Tue Sep 9, 10:54 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Tue Sep 9, 11:40 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Andi Kleen, (Tue Sep 9, 12:07 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Tue Sep 9, 12:21 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 12:59 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Tue Sep 9, 1:25 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Wed Sep 10, 9:08 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Mon Sep 22, 3:49 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Mon Sep 22, 4:09 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Andi Kleen, (Mon Sep 22, 1:30 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Mon Sep 22, 3:22 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Mon Sep 22, 3:26 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Rick Jones, (Mon Sep 22, 3:47 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Mon Sep 22, 3:57 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Mon Sep 22, 4:00 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Mon Sep 22, 4:13 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Mon Sep 22, 4:21 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Andi Kleen, (Mon Sep 22, 4:24 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Andi Kleen, (Mon Sep 22, 5:14 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Rick Jones, (Mon Sep 22, 5:33 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Mon Sep 22, 6:40 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Andi Kleen, (Mon Sep 22, 7:12 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Andi Kleen, (Mon Sep 22, 7:23 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Mon Sep 22, 7:28 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Andi Kleen, (Mon Sep 22, 7:41 pm)