| There are two paths forward at the current point in time.
|
| 1) You submit a very small group of patches at a time to me.
| I'm talking like 5 or 6 patches at a time, maximum.
|
| And I'm going to give extra amounts of personal review to
| these, so it will take even more time than usual.
|
Further review can never harm, so I am sure this will be good.I have a question regarding granularity - the current granularity is
meant to be logical, but is low.
It is easy to get distracted by the details since at the end of
the day the 37 patches achieve a rewriting of feat.c in small steps.Would you therefore be ok with me combining some of the patches or would
you prefer to review the set at its current granularity?Thanks
Gerrit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Ian Campbell | Re: [PATCH] x86: Construct 32 bit boot time page tables in native format. |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Justin Piszcz | Linux Software RAID 5 Performance Optimizations: 2.6.19.1: (211MB/s read & 195... |
| Alan | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Matthias Scheler | Re: HEADS UP: timecounters (branch simonb-timecounters) merged into -current |
| David Laight | long usernames |
| Quentin Garnier | Re: Understanding foo_open, foo_read, etc. |
| Jared D. McNeill | Breaking binary compatibility for /dev/joy |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
