Home » Mailing list archives » linux-netdev » 2008 » September » 21

Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: David Miller
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure.
Date: Sunday, September 21, 2008 - 2:17 am

From: James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 10:13:47 +0100


Yes, but we should preserve per-flow ordering as much as
possible within the local system for optimal performance.

Things fall apart completely, even with TCP, once you reorder more
than 2 or 3 packets deep.


Again, Steffen's patches take care of this issue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., David Miller, (Fri Sep 19, 11:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Daniel Walker, (Sat Sep 20, 8:29 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Sep 20, 8:45 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Daniel Walker, (Sat Sep 20, 9:02 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Sep 20, 9:19 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Daniel Walker, (Sat Sep 20, 10:40 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Sep 20, 11:09 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Daniel Walker, (Sat Sep 20, 11:52 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., David Miller, (Sat Sep 20, 12:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., David Miller, (Sat Sep 20, 1:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., David Miller, (Sat Sep 20, 1:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Herbert Xu, (Sat Sep 20, 11:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., David Miller, (Sat Sep 20, 11:57 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., James Courtier-Dutton, (Sun Sep 21, 2:13 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., David Miller, (Sun Sep 21, 2:17 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Steffen Klassert, (Sun Sep 21, 2:46 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Herbert Xu, (Mon Sep 22, 1:23 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Ilpo Järvinen, (Mon Sep 22, 3:36 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Steffen Klassert, (Mon Sep 22, 6:54 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Chris Friesen, (Mon Sep 22, 2:22 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., David Miller, (Mon Sep 22, 3:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Chris Friesen, (Tue Sep 23, 10:03 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Tom Herbert, (Tue Sep 23, 2:10 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., David Miller, (Tue Sep 23, 2:51 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 23, 9:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., David Miller, (Wed Sep 24, 12:42 am)