From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:38:01 +0100

quoted text
> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 19:38 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> [...]
> > So on a multiqueue card with 2 RX queues and 2 TX queues we'd
> > have names like:
> > 
> > 	eth0-rx-0
> > 	eth0-rx-1
> > 	eth0-tx-0
> > 	eth0-tx-1
> > 
> > So let's make an effort to get this done right in 2.6.28 and meanwhile
> > Arjan can add the irqbalanced code.
> 
> What about the case where an interrupt is shared between RX and TX
> completions?  Our hardware is very flexible in this regard, but based on
> performance testing prior to the introduction of TX multiqueue we
> currently allocate multiple interrupts for RX completions and share the
> first with TX completions.

Probably it would be sufficient to purely use eth0-N, it's just so
that irqbalanced knows that the interrupts are related.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html