On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 19:38 -0700, David Miller wrote: [...]What about the case where an interrupt is shared between RX and TX completions? Our hardware is very flexible in this regard, but based on performance testing prior to the introduction of TX multiqueue we currently allocate multiple interrupts for RX completions and share the first with TX completions. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Max Krasnyansky | Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime us... |
| Jeremy Allison | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Randy Dunlap | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 (pcmcia) |
| Damien Wyart | ACPI power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7) |
git: | |
| Josip Rodin | Re: bnx2_poll panicking kernel |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Denys Fedoryshchenko | thousands of classes, e1000 TX unit hang |
