Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...>
Cc: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...>, Netdev <netdev@...>
Date: Thursday, September 11, 2008 - 12:08 am

Andi Kleen wrote:

It needs the changed constants replaced with the _DEFAULT versions in 
net/dccp/timer.c and net/dccp/output.c to build with DCCP enabled.  I did that, 
and tested it (over loopback).  The tunables come up at 0, not the expected 
default values, and when that happens, latencies are extremely low, as would be 
expected with a value of 0, but when I set net.ipv4.tcp_delack_min to *any* 
non-zero value, the old 40 ms magic number becomes 200 ms.  I haven't yet 
figured out why.  Tweaking net.ipv4.tcp_ato_min isn't having any observable 
effect on my loopback latencies.

I think there may be something worth pursuing with a tcp_delack_min tunable. 
Any suggestions on where I should look to debug this?

-- Chris


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Christopher Snook, (Mon Sep 8, 5:56 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Andi Kleen, (Mon Sep 8, 6:55 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Tue Sep 9, 1:22 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Rick Jones, (Mon Sep 8, 6:39 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Tue Sep 9, 1:10 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Rick Jones, (Tue Sep 9, 12:33 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chuck Lever, (Tue Sep 9, 12:54 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Rick Jones, (Tue Sep 9, 1:54 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Tue Sep 9, 1:21 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Andi Kleen, (Tue Sep 9, 10:36 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Tue Sep 9, 2:40 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 3:59 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Mon Sep 22, 6:49 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Mon Sep 22, 7:09 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Andi Kleen, (Mon Sep 22, 4:30 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Mon Sep 22, 6:22 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Rick Jones, (Mon Sep 22, 6:47 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Mon Sep 22, 6:57 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Mon Sep 22, 6:26 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Mon Sep 22, 7:00 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Mon Sep 22, 7:13 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Andi Kleen, (Mon Sep 22, 7:24 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Mon Sep 22, 7:21 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Andi Kleen, (Mon Sep 22, 8:14 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Mon Sep 22, 9:40 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Andi Kleen, (Mon Sep 22, 10:23 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Mon Sep 22, 10:28 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Andi Kleen, (Mon Sep 22, 10:41 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Rick Jones, (Mon Sep 22, 8:33 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Andi Kleen, (Mon Sep 22, 10:12 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Tue Sep 9, 4:25 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Andi Kleen, (Tue Sep 9, 3:07 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Thu Sep 11, 12:08 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Tue Sep 9, 3:21 pm)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 1:17 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Tue Sep 9, 1:56 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Evgeniy Polyakov, (Tue Sep 9, 2:22 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Tue Sep 9, 9:00 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Chris Snook, (Tue Sep 9, 2:28 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 2:02 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Mark Brown, (Tue Sep 9, 6:31 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 8:05 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, Mark Brown, (Tue Sep 9, 8:09 am)
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning, David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 8:19 am)