On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:43:09 PDT, Stephen Hemminger said:Did you mean "apparently working but *non*-standards conforming"? Other than that, seems to be a sane application of "Be conservative in what you send". Our network is some 30K cat-5 ports, 1100 switches, 1300 wireless access points, and we appreciate it every time somebody makes things more bulletproof. And yes, we prefer things to out-and-out *fail* rather than run in a wonky configuration - hard failures usually get fixed in a few minutes, wonkiness can drag on for months of mystifying symptoms...
| Faik Uygur | Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1 |
| pageexec | Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.25.10 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Mark Lord | Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
