Re: [RFC] bridge: STP timer management range checking

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...>, Dushan Tcholich <dusanc@...>, Francois Romieu <romieu@...>, Robert Hancock <hancockr@...>, <netdev@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, <bridge@...>
Date: Sunday, August 31, 2008 - 10:25 pm

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:43:09 PDT, Stephen Hemminger said:


Did you mean "apparently working but *non*-standards conforming"?

Other than that, seems to be a sane application of "Be conservative in what you
send".  Our network is some 30K cat-5 ports, 1100 switches, 1300 wireless
access points, and we appreciate it every time somebody makes things more
bulletproof.  And yes, we prefer things to out-and-out *fail* rather than
run in a wonky configuration - hard failures usually get fixed in a few
minutes, wonkiness can drag on for months of mystifying symptoms...
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: ksoftirqd high cpu load on kernels 2.6.24 to 2.6.27-rc1-..., Stephen Hemminger, (Sun Aug 31, 1:05 pm)
[RFC] bridge: STP timer management range checking, Stephen Hemminger, (Sun Aug 31, 1:43 pm)
[PATCH] bridge: don't allow setting hello time to zero, Stephen Hemminger, (Thu Sep 4, 6:47 pm)
Re: [PATCH] bridge: don't allow setting hello time to zero, Dushan Tcholich, (Mon Sep 8, 5:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH] bridge: don't allow setting hello time to zero, Stephen Hemminger, (Mon Sep 8, 6:33 pm)
Re: [RFC] bridge: STP timer management range checking, David Miller, (Tue Sep 2, 8:28 pm)
Re: [RFC] bridge: STP timer management range checking, , (Sun Aug 31, 10:25 pm)
Re: [RFC] bridge: STP timer management range checking, Stephen Hemminger, (Sun Aug 31, 7:29 pm)
Re: [RFC] bridge: STP timer management range checking, David Miller, (Tue Sep 2, 7:41 pm)