On Saturday 09 August 2008, Suresh Siddha wrote:process interrupt The first solution - if it works and padlock is the only which has problem with it - seems to be a good fix for 2.6.26. If it works I can't say as I'm not familiar enough with these things. But I'll happily test it :-). The second would be a little bit intrusive, wouldn't it? Most machines don't have padlock, and therfore don't need this change but nevertheless may be affected (i.e. they use MMX for memcpy or MMX/SSE with raid6) and now get a different behaviour. Don't know how expensive such a local_irq_enable/disable would be. Regards, -- Wolfgang Walter Studentenwerk München Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Ingo Molnar | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Roland Dreier | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
