Re: Kernel oops with 2.6.26, padlock and ipsec: probably problem with fpu state changes

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Wolfgang Walter
Date: Friday, August 8, 2008 - 4:10 pm

On Friday 08 August 2008, Suresh Siddha wrote:
is
changelog

Fine.

By the way, if padlock is used from userspace, could this be aproblem, too? I 
mean not via the kernel crypto layer but directly. I think these extensions 
are not restricted to a privileged user.

Regards,
-- 
Wolfgang Walter
Studentenwerk München
Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts
Leiter EDV
Leopoldstraße 15
80802 München
Tel: +49 89 38196-276
Fax: +49 89 38196-144
wolfgang.walter@stwm.de
http://www.studentenwerk-muenchen.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Kernel oops with 2.6.26, padlock and ipsec: probably p ..., Wolfgang Walter, (Fri Aug 8, 4:10 pm)