Re: SO_REUSEPORT?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <netdev@...>
Date: Thursday, August 7, 2008 - 1:58 pm

> > We are looking at ways to scale TCP listeners.  I think we like is the

We've been doing that, but then on wakeup it would seem that we're at
the mercy of scheduling-- basically which ever threads wakes up first
will get to process accept queue first.  This seems to bias towards
threads running on the same CPU as the wakeup is called, and   so this
method doesn't give us an even distribution of new connections across
the threads that we'd like.

Tom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
SO_REUSEPORT?, Tom Herbert, (Thu Aug 7, 12:57 pm)
Re: SO_REUSEPORT?, Rémi Denis-Courmont, (Thu Aug 7, 1:09 pm)
Re: SO_REUSEPORT?, Tom Herbert, (Thu Aug 7, 1:58 pm)
Re: SO_REUSEPORT?, Rick Jones, (Thu Aug 7, 2:17 pm)
Re: SO_REUSEPORT?, Stephen Hemminger, (Thu Aug 7, 3:03 pm)
Re: SO_REUSEPORT?, Tom Herbert, (Thu Aug 7, 3:43 pm)
Re: SO_REUSEPORT?, Rick Jones, (Thu Aug 7, 4:14 pm)
Re: SO_REUSEPORT?, Tom Herbert, (Thu Aug 7, 7:05 pm)
Re: SO_REUSEPORT?, Rick Jones, (Thu Aug 7, 7:28 pm)