Re: SO_REUSEPORT?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@...>
Cc: <netdev@...>
Date: Thursday, August 7, 2008 - 1:09 pm

Le jeudi 7 août 2008 19:57:15 Tom Herbert, vous avez écrit :

On Linux, SO_REUSEADDR provide most of what SO_REUSEPORT provides on BSD.

In any case, there is absolutely no point in creating multiple TCP listeners. 
Multiple threads can accept() on the same listener - at the same time.

-- 
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
SO_REUSEPORT?, Tom Herbert, (Thu Aug 7, 12:57 pm)
Re: SO_REUSEPORT?, Rémi Denis-Courmont, (Thu Aug 7, 1:09 pm)
Re: SO_REUSEPORT?, Tom Herbert, (Thu Aug 7, 1:58 pm)
Re: SO_REUSEPORT?, Rick Jones, (Thu Aug 7, 2:17 pm)
Re: SO_REUSEPORT?, Stephen Hemminger, (Thu Aug 7, 3:03 pm)
Re: SO_REUSEPORT?, Tom Herbert, (Thu Aug 7, 3:43 pm)
Re: SO_REUSEPORT?, Rick Jones, (Thu Aug 7, 4:14 pm)
Re: SO_REUSEPORT?, Tom Herbert, (Thu Aug 7, 7:05 pm)
Re: SO_REUSEPORT?, Rick Jones, (Thu Aug 7, 7:28 pm)