Re: iproute2 proposal

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...>, <netdev@...>
Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2008 - 6:04 am

On Wednesday 06 August 2008, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Probably for tc batch it doesn't matter, so this optimization can be done only 
for tc (i exclude also monitor functions, they must renew list of 
interfaces).

Is new patch looks better? (i test it, it compiles and doesn't break tc, and 
makes still things much faster on systems with many interfaces).





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
iproute2 proposal, Denys Fedoryshchenko, (Tue Aug 5, 6:25 pm)
Re: iproute2 proposal, Patrick McHardy, (Wed Aug 6, 4:28 am)
Re: iproute2 proposal, Denys Fedoryshchenko, (Wed Aug 6, 6:04 am)
Re: iproute2 proposal, Patrick McHardy, (Wed Aug 6, 6:09 am)
Re: iproute2 proposal, Denys Fedoryshchenko, (Wed Aug 6, 6:22 am)
Re: iproute2 proposal, Patrick McHardy, (Wed Aug 6, 6:25 am)
Re: iproute2 proposal, Denys Fedoryshchenko, (Wed Aug 6, 6:38 am)
Re: iproute2 proposal, Patrick McHardy, (Wed Aug 6, 6:09 am)