On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 10:19:44PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
quoted text
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 12:18:15PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
...
quoted text
> > Jarek, we can't put the root lock back into the netdev_queue, it
> > breaks all of the RCU handling of qdisc_destroy() which is fundamental
> > for how all the multiqueue stuff works now.
> > 
> > See my other emails, it isn't even necessary anyways.
...
quoted text
> Thanks for the explanations: BTW, I think, the qdisc_root_lock is a
> bit misleading name, if qdisc_lock is also used for taking root lock.
> Of course, this all makes sense, it simply needs more checking.

After some re-checking one more question: why do you think this
qdisc_root_lock() is safe as sch_tree_lock() (or anywhere else)? It
seems, eg. during deactivation it can get root_lock of qdisc_default,
and proceed with another qdisc?

Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html