[PATCH 26/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 1 (socket setup)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <dccp@...>
Cc: <netdev@...>, Gerrit Renker <gerrit@...>
Date: Thursday, August 28, 2008 - 1:45 pm

This first patch out of three replaces the hardcoded default settings with
initialisation code for the dynamic feature negotiation.

Note on retransmitting Confirm options:
---------------------------------------
This patch also defers flushing the client feature-negotiation queue,
due to the following considerations.

As long as the client is in PARTOPEN, it needs to retransmit the Confirm
options for the Change options received on the DCCP-Response from the server.

Otherwise, if the packet containing the Confirm options gets dropped in the
network, the connection aborts due to undefined feature negotiation state.

Thanks to Leandro Melo de Sales who reported a bug in an earlier revision
of the patch set, resulting from not retransmitting the Confirm options.

The patch now ensures that the client feature-negotiation queue is flushed only
when entering the OPEN state. Since confirmed Change options are removed as
soon as they are confirmed (in the DCCP-Response), this ensures that Confirm
options are retransmitted.

Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Acked-by: Ian McDonald <ian.mcdonald@jandi.co.nz>
---
 net/dccp/proto.c |   46 ++++++----------------------------------------
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

--- a/net/dccp/proto.c
+++ b/net/dccp/proto.c
@@ -67,6 +67,9 @@ void dccp_set_state(struct sock *sk, const int state)
 	case DCCP_OPEN:
 		if (oldstate != DCCP_OPEN)
 			DCCP_INC_STATS(DCCP_MIB_CURRESTAB);
+		/* Client retransmits all Confirm options until entering OPEN */
+		if (oldstate == DCCP_PARTOPEN)
+			dccp_feat_list_purge(&dccp_sk(sk)->dccps_featneg);
 		break;
 
 	case DCCP_CLOSED:
@@ -175,7 +178,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dccp_state_name);
 int dccp_init_sock(struct sock *sk, const __u8 ctl_sock_initialized)
 {
 	struct dccp_sock *dp = dccp_sk(sk);
-	struct dccp_minisock *dmsk = dccp_msk(sk);
 	struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
 
 	dccp_minisock_init(&dp->dccps_minisock);
@@ -194,45 +196,9 @@ int dccp_init_sock(struct sock *sk, const __u8 ctl_sock_initialized)
 	dccp_init_xmit_timers(sk);
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dp->dccps_featneg);
-	/*
-	 * FIXME: We're hardcoding the CCID, and doing this at this point makes
-	 * the listening (master) sock get CCID control blocks, which is not
-	 * necessary, but for now, to not mess with the test userspace apps,
-	 * lets leave it here, later the real solution is to do this in a
-	 * setsockopt(CCIDs-I-want/accept). -acme
-	 */
-	if (likely(ctl_sock_initialized)) {
-		int rc = dccp_feat_init(sk);
-
-		if (rc)
-			return rc;
-
-		if (dmsk->dccpms_send_ack_vector) {
-			dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackvec = dccp_ackvec_alloc(GFP_KERNEL);
-			if (dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackvec == NULL)
-				return -ENOMEM;
-		}
-		dp->dccps_hc_rx_ccid = ccid_hc_rx_new(dmsk->dccpms_rx_ccid,
-						      sk, GFP_KERNEL);
-		dp->dccps_hc_tx_ccid = ccid_hc_tx_new(dmsk->dccpms_tx_ccid,
-						      sk, GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (unlikely(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ccid == NULL ||
-			     dp->dccps_hc_tx_ccid == NULL)) {
-			ccid_hc_rx_delete(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ccid, sk);
-			ccid_hc_tx_delete(dp->dccps_hc_tx_ccid, sk);
-			if (dmsk->dccpms_send_ack_vector) {
-				dccp_ackvec_free(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackvec);
-				dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackvec = NULL;
-			}
-			dp->dccps_hc_rx_ccid = dp->dccps_hc_tx_ccid = NULL;
-			return -ENOMEM;
-		}
-	} else {
-		/* control socket doesn't need feat nego */
-		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dmsk->dccpms_pending);
-		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dmsk->dccpms_conf);
-	}
-
+	/* control socket doesn't need feat nego */
+	if (likely(ctl_sock_initialized))
+		return dccp_feat_init(sk);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.6.0.rc2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature nego..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Thu Aug 28, 3:43 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/37] --- Summary of revision changes so far, Gerrit Renker, (Sat Aug 30, 1:25 pm)
Re: net-next-2.6 [pull-request] [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Revised s..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Tue Sep 2, 9:50 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/5] dccp: Basic data structure for feature negot..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Mon Sep 22, 10:10 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] dccp: Implement lookup table for feature-neg..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Mon Sep 22, 10:21 am)
Re: v2 [PATCH 2/5] dccp: Implement lookup table for feature-..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Wed Sep 24, 10:01 am)
Re: v2 [PATCH 1/5] dccp: Basic data structure for feature ne..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Wed Sep 24, 9:59 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] dccp: Auto-load (when supported) CCID plugin..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Mon Dec 15, 9:48 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] dccp: Auto-load (when supported) CCID plugin..., Michał Mirosław, (Sat Dec 13, 9:55 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] dccp: Auto-load (when supported) CCID plugin..., Michał Mirosław, (Sun Dec 14, 10:50 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] dccp: Auto-load (when supported) CCID plugin..., Michał Mirosław, (Tue Dec 16, 7:31 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] dccp: Auto-load (when supported) CCID plugin..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Tue Dec 16, 7:19 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] dccp: Auto-load (when supported) CCID plugin..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Tue Dec 16, 6:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] dccp: Auto-load (when supported) CCID plugin..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Wed Dec 17, 9:13 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] dccp: Auto-load (when supported) CCID plugin..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Thu Dec 18, 10:01 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] dccp: Initialisation and type-checking of fe..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Mon Dec 15, 10:15 am)
[PATCH 3/6] dccp: Preference list reconciliation, Gerrit Renker, (Sun Nov 30, 9:22 am)
[PATCH 5/6] dccp: Processing Confirm options, Gerrit Renker, (Sun Nov 30, 9:22 am)
[PATCH 6/6] dccp: Feature activation handlers, Gerrit Renker, (Sun Nov 30, 9:22 am)
[PATCH 2/5] dccp: API to query the current TX/RX CCID, Gerrit Renker, (Sat Nov 22, 6:30 am)
[PATCH 4/5] dccp: Support for Mandatory options, Gerrit Renker, (Sat Nov 22, 6:30 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] dccp: Support for Mandatory options, David Miller, (Sun Nov 23, 8:09 pm)
[PATCH 1/5] dccp: Mechanism to resolve CCID dependencies, Gerrit Renker, (Sat Nov 15, 8:11 am)
[PATCH 2/5] dccp: Deprecate old setsockopt framework, Gerrit Renker, (Sat Nov 15, 8:11 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] dccp: Deprecate old setsockopt framework, Gerrit Renker, (Mon Nov 17, 11:31 am)
[PATCH 4/5] dccp: Deprecate Ack Ratio sysctl, Gerrit Renker, (Sat Nov 15, 8:11 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] dccp: Deprecate Ack Ratio sysctl, David Miller, (Mon Nov 17, 2:56 am)
[PATCH 5/5] dccp: Tidy up setsockopt calls, Gerrit Renker, (Sat Nov 15, 8:11 am)
Re: [PATCH 5/5] dccp: Tidy up setsockopt calls, David Miller, (Mon Nov 17, 2:57 am)
[PATCH 3/4] dccp: Query supported CCIDs, Gerrit Renker, (Thu Nov 6, 1:40 am)
v2 [PATCH 3/4] dccp: Query supported CCIDs, Gerrit Renker, (Wed Nov 12, 2:37 am)
Re: v2 [PATCH 3/4] dccp: Query supported CCIDs, David Miller, (Wed Nov 12, 4:49 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/4] dccp: Query supported CCIDs, David Miller, (Mon Nov 10, 5:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] dccp: Implement lookup table for feature-neg..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Mon Sep 22, 1:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] dccp: Implement lookup table for feature-neg..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Wed Sep 24, 9:58 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] dccp: Implement lookup table for feature-neg..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Mon Sep 22, 12:49 pm)
Re: What to do with DCCP, David Miller, (Thu Sep 11, 1:53 am)
Re: What to do with DCCP, Gerrit Renker, (Fri Sep 12, 1:16 am)
Re: net-next-2.6 [pull-request] [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Revised s..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Thu Sep 11, 10:02 am)
Re: [PATCH 04/37] dccp: Per-socket initialisation of feature..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Thu Aug 28, 3:53 pm)
Re: [PATCH 06/37] dccp: Limit feature negotiation to connect..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Thu Aug 28, 4:50 pm)
Re: [PATCH 07/37] dccp: Registration routines for changing f..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Thu Aug 28, 4:54 pm)
[PATCH 08/37] dccp: Query supported CCIDs, Gerrit Renker, (Thu Aug 28, 1:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH 08/37] dccp: Query supported CCIDs, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Thu Aug 28, 5:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH 08/37] dccp: Query supported CCIDs, Gerrit Renker, (Sat Aug 30, 9:52 am)
Re: [PATCH 08/37] dccp: Query supported CCIDs, Gerrit Renker, (Fri Aug 29, 2:17 am)
Re: [PATCH 09/37] dccp: Resolve dependencies of features on ..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Thu Aug 28, 5:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH 09/37] dccp: Resolve dependencies of features on ..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Wed Sep 3, 8:59 pm)
[PATCH 11/37] dccp: Deprecate old setsockopt framework, Gerrit Renker, (Thu Aug 28, 1:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH 12/37] dccp: Feature negotiation for minimum-chec..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Thu Aug 28, 5:25 pm)
[PATCH 13/37] dccp: Deprecate Ack Ratio sysctl, Gerrit Renker, (Thu Aug 28, 1:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH 13/37] dccp: Deprecate Ack Ratio sysctl, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Thu Aug 28, 5:26 pm)
[PATCH 14/37] dccp: Tidy up setsockopt calls, Gerrit Renker, (Thu Aug 28, 1:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH 14/37] dccp: Tidy up setsockopt calls, Eugene Teo, (Fri Aug 29, 5:25 am)
Re: [PATCH 14/37] dccp: Tidy up setsockopt calls, Gerrit Renker, (Sat Aug 30, 9:52 am)
Re: [PATCH 14/37] dccp: Tidy up setsockopt calls, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Thu Aug 28, 5:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH 14/37] dccp: Tidy up setsockopt calls, Gerrit Renker, (Fri Aug 29, 2:57 am)
Re: [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket ..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Thu Aug 28, 5:45 pm)
[PATCH 16/37] dccp: API to query the current TX/RX CCID, Gerrit Renker, (Thu Aug 28, 1:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH 16/37] dccp: API to query the current TX/RX CCID, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Thu Aug 28, 5:47 pm)
Re: [PATCH 17/37] dccp: Increase the scope of variable-lengt..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Thu Aug 28, 5:48 pm)
[PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options, Gerrit Renker, (Thu Aug 28, 1:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Thu Aug 28, 5:50 pm)
[PATCH 22/37] dccp: Preference list reconciliation, Gerrit Renker, (Thu Aug 28, 1:44 pm)
[PATCH 24/37] dccp: Processing Confirm options, Gerrit Renker, (Thu Aug 28, 1:44 pm)
[PATCH 25/37] dccp: Feature activation handlers, Gerrit Renker, (Thu Aug 28, 1:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH 25/37] dccp: Feature activation handlers, Wei Yongjun, (Tue Sep 2, 2:34 am)
Re: [PATCH 25/37] dccp: Feature activation handlers, Gerrit Renker, (Wed Sep 3, 12:38 am)
Re: [PATCH 25/37] dccp: Feature activation handlers, Wei Yongjun, (Wed Sep 3, 1:42 am)
Re: [PATCH 25/37] dccp: Feature activation handlers, Gerrit Renker, (Thu Sep 4, 1:12 am)
[PATCH 26/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activatio..., Gerrit Renker, (Thu Aug 28, 1:45 pm)