Re: [bisected] Weird sysctl regression

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Arnaud Ebalard
Date: Saturday, August 23, 2008 - 2:09 pm

Hi,

Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> writes:


Sorry for the delay. Yes, no additional patches in both cases:

- stock 2.6.27-rc4 from kernel.org
- freshly cloned net-next-2.6 after David's announcement

Cheers,

a+

ps: if you have various ideas you want to test on that issue (additional
    debug, printks, ...), don't hesitate to send me patches ...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [bisected] Weird sysctl regression, Arnaud Ebalard, (Sat Aug 23, 9:03 am)
Re: [bisected] Weird sysctl regression, Al Viro, (Sat Aug 23, 10:02 am)
Re: [bisected] Weird sysctl regression, Arnaud Ebalard, (Sat Aug 23, 10:13 am)
Re: [bisected] Weird sysctl regression, Al Viro, (Sat Aug 23, 11:16 am)
Re: [bisected] Weird sysctl regression, Arnaud Ebalard, (Sat Aug 23, 2:09 pm)
Re: [bisected] Weird sysctl regression, Al Viro, (Sun Aug 24, 4:54 am)