On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 06:23:55PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
That's my point - is there really a reason do this change without such
an audit if we are not forced at the moment? (I'd remind this way of
doing things was entirely legal according to comments.) I doubt, I'm
the right person for auditing this but as I said I'll have a look,
especially when there will be lack of those fascinating oopses and
warnings around.
Cheers,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Srivatsa Vaddagiri | containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Benjamin Herrenschmidt | Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Patrick McHardy | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 6/7] [CCID-2/3]: Fix sparse warnings |
