On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 05:23:16PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:This case is quite clear. By convention, there was always this comment that destroy is under sch_tree_lock(), so it was legal to depend on this. I'm not afraid of somebody using such an under destroy qdisc - it's about a code inside this qdisc could refer to not destroyed part. Sure, I'll try to look for such problems. Cheers, Jarek P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Christoph Lameter | [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support) |
| Chuck Ebbert | Re: Linux 2.6.21 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Hugh Dickins | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
