On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 02:34:44PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
Actually, I've only asked you to withdraw this patch for now, but I'm
still not convinced you're right. You should better show me first the
place where this can make a difference. (I think this test broke for
some other non RCU reason.) So, maybe you're right, but I've to check
this more.
BTW, I guess you've seen this other thread: "panic 2.6.27-rc3-git2,
qdisc_dequeue_head" where Denys and I fight with this new locking.
Alas, it looks to me as a real mess, and I currently try with this
previous idea of netdev_queue->qdisc_lock, which you didn't like too.
But, after looking at the current bugs shown by debugging I really
think we'll have bugs here all the time without simplifying this.
I think my concept should work soon, but if you don't agree with
this at all we can stop and wait for better ideas.
Thanks,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Theodore Tso | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 011/196] sysfs: Fix a copy-n-paste typo in comment |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
