Re: Kernel oops with 2.6.26, padlock and ipsec: probably problem with fpu state changes

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Wolfgang Walter <wolfgang.walter@...>, netdev@vger.kernel.org <netdev@...>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@...>, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk <viro@...>, vegard.nossum@gmail.com <vegard.nossum@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>
Date: Monday, August 11, 2008 - 8:46 pm

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 05:42:21PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

Sorry, the kernel TS state is what I meant.  I'm definitely not
advocating the saving of the kernel FPU state.  This is only for
things like the VIA (which also exists for other processors, see
the xor SSE stuff in include/asm-x86).

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Kernel oops with 2.6.26, padlock and ipsec: probably pro..., Herbert Xu, (Mon Aug 11, 8:46 pm)