Re: LRO restructuring?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Miller
Date: Monday, August 11, 2008 - 2:03 pm

From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@myri.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:30:33 -0400


Intermediate nodes are not supposed to change the transport layer
checksum if at all possible, especially on routers.

Otherwise it is much more difficult to diagnose checksum errors,
and figure out what caused such an error.

When the router doesn't modify the checksum, we know it's an end-node.
Even a firewall only "adjusts" checksums based upon packet
modifications for NAT and such, which will preserve end-node created
errors.

So no this isn't really an option.

This is why Herbert wants to preserve the original headers,
we're not supposed to change them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
LRO restructuring?, Andrew Gallatin, (Mon Aug 11, 6:30 am)
Re: LRO restructuring?, David Miller, (Mon Aug 11, 2:03 pm)
Re: LRO restructuring?, Herbert Xu, (Mon Aug 11, 5:50 pm)
Re: LRO restructuring?, David Miller, (Mon Aug 11, 5:54 pm)
Re: LRO restructuring?, Herbert Xu, (Mon Aug 11, 6:00 pm)
Re: LRO restructuring?, Rick Jones, (Mon Aug 11, 6:30 pm)
Re: LRO restructuring?, David Miller, (Mon Aug 11, 6:39 pm)
Re: LRO restructuring?, Herbert Xu, (Mon Aug 11, 6:53 pm)
Re: LRO restructuring?, Andrew Gallatin, (Tue Aug 12, 4:50 am)
Re: LRO restructuring?, Herbert Xu, (Tue Aug 12, 7:14 pm)