Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
quoted text
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:01:18PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
>>> When inserting a vlan tag into an skb by hand (in the case the
>>> target network device hardware does not support inserting a vlan
>>> tag by passing it in via the TX descriptor), making a copy of the
>>> skb to be modified by calling skb_copy() is overkill, since
>>> skb_copy() will needlessly linearize the skb, copying of all of
>>> the fragmented data around, and checksumming the paket in software
>>> even if the hardware is perfectly capable of doing that by itself.
>>>
>>> For this case, pskb_copy() does exactly what is needed and no more,
>>> so use that instead.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com>
>> This looks fine to me.
> 
> OK.  Since the mv643xx_eth patch (2/2) depends on both this patch
> and the one you/I sent previously, could you merge the mv643xx_eth
> patch (2/2) via your tree as well?


I already sent the network_header fix to Dave, so its probably
easiest to have it go through him directly. Your patch applies
cleanly on top of my VLAN update from this morning.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html