Olivier Galibert wrote:Many distribution have some way for separate kernel module packages. It's essentially the same problem so it should be already solved in some way. Also there are already drivers who rely on separate firmware so they already should have this problem (and hopefully a solution). Of course these existing solutions might not be good enough. And a lot of people ignored them because they didn't use these external packages and drivers with those requirements. I agree with you that doing this for more drivers will be a further complication and the rationale why this complication is needed for drivers like tg3 or e100 so far didn't sound very convincing to me. If I read it correctly it was "some other drivers do it this way so let's complicate everybody and put them on the same level". Perhaps I'm dense, but I failed to see the convincing reason in that. On the other hand for my personal use it this change should be transparent, at least as long as "make firmware_install" will be integrated into "make modules_install" and put the files somewhere where they don't conflict with other versions. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH x86] [0/16] Various i386/x86-64 changes |
| Vladislav Bolkhovitin | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Pavel Roskin | ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
