Re: [RFC] support for IEEE 1588

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...>, <netdev@...>
Date: Thursday, July 3, 2008 - 8:42 pm

On Friday 04 July 2008, Rick Jones wrote:


We actually currently use them for delay/jitter calculation in conjunction 
with having the RX and TX port's source timestamping units running in sync. 
We can do that since both the RX and TX port (Linux based) will run in our 
hardware (chassis).

I guess we could try to do a simple sync between the host clock and the hw 
clock by getting the initial delta between the two. But since the two clocks 
are not in sync, they will diverge in time. And since I do not know enough 
about the way in which tstamp is currently used, I'm not very confident that 
this will not break something... so, back to grepping :)

Thanks,
tavi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC] support for IEEE 1588, Octavian Purdila, (Thu Jul 3, 6:47 pm)
Re: [RFC] support for IEEE 1588, Lennart Sorensen, (Wed Jul 9, 11:31 am)
Re: [RFC] support for IEEE 1588, Patrick Ohly, (Fri Jul 4, 9:37 am)
Re: [RFC] support for IEEE 1588, Octavian Purdila, (Fri Jul 4, 8:21 pm)
Re: [RFC] support for IEEE 1588, Patrick Ohly, (Mon Jul 7, 8:34 am)
Re: [RFC] support for IEEE 1588, Stephen Hemminger, (Thu Jul 3, 7:24 pm)
Re: [RFC] support for IEEE 1588, Octavian Purdila, (Thu Jul 3, 7:40 pm)
Re: [RFC] support for IEEE 1588, Rick Jones, (Thu Jul 3, 8:15 pm)
Re: [RFC] support for IEEE 1588, Andi Kleen, (Fri Jul 4, 7:24 am)
Re: [RFC] support for IEEE 1588, Octavian Purdila, (Thu Jul 3, 8:42 pm)