On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 07:14:39AM -0400, jamal wrote:
quoted text
> 
> > Only if you also want to share it :) In the end I patched it to
> > not share it which is much easier.
> 
> I am trying to visualize: if you dont share, you must have 256K copies
> then? Assuming also you have a fast lookup since that was design intent.

They can't be shared anyway because each of those 256K rules NATs
to a different IP address.

quoted text
> #ifdef CONFIG_HASH_SIZE
> #define NAT_TAB_MASK CONFIGURED_HASH_SIZE
> #else
> #define NAT_TAB_MASK 15
> #endif
> 
> What do you think?

Sorry, I think I'll have to poke my eyes out :)

But yeah if we ever get a generic dynamic hash table implmenetation
then I'd be happy for act_nat to use that.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html