Re: TXQ real_num_tx_queues comments/questions

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Johannes Berg
Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 - 2:49 am

On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 02:39 -0700, David Miller wrote:

Yes, I think we can fix it by deferring the requeue to a workqueue,
using synchronize_net() and putting RCU protection against the
select_queue call.

johannes
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
TXQ real_num_tx_queues comments/questions, Johannes Berg, (Fri Jul 11, 2:47 am)
Re: TXQ real_num_tx_queues comments/questions, David Miller, (Tue Jul 15, 2:16 am)
Re: TXQ real_num_tx_queues comments/questions, Johannes Berg, (Tue Jul 15, 2:25 am)
Re: TXQ real_num_tx_queues comments/questions, David Miller, (Tue Jul 15, 2:28 am)
Re: TXQ real_num_tx_queues comments/questions, Johannes Berg, (Tue Jul 15, 2:37 am)
Re: TXQ real_num_tx_queues comments/questions, David Miller, (Tue Jul 15, 2:39 am)
Re: TXQ real_num_tx_queues comments/questions, Johannes Berg, (Tue Jul 15, 2:49 am)
Re: TXQ real_num_tx_queues comments/questions, David Miller, (Tue Jul 15, 3:05 am)
Re: TXQ real_num_tx_queues comments/questions, Johannes Berg, (Tue Jul 15, 3:28 am)