David Miller said the following on 2008-7-15 11:51:
As my understanding, packet_dev_mclist() is the only reader who doesn't
use same lock as writers(actually it doesn't use any lock).
My proposal is that use RTNL to prevent synchronous access to po->mclist.
Because packet_dev_mclist() is only called when device be unregistered,
the lock will not affect speed too much.
Signed-off-by: Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
index 2cee87d..9eb39f7 100644
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -1196,10 +1196,12 @@ static void packet_dev_mc(struct net_device *dev, struct packet_mclist *i, int w
static void packet_dev_mclist(struct net_device *dev, struct packet_mclist *i, int what)
{
+ rtnl_lock();
for ( ; i; i=i->next) {
if (i->ifindex == dev->ifindex)
packet_dev_mc(dev, i, what);
}
+ rtnl_unlock();
}
static int packet_mc_add(struct sock *sk, struct packet_mreq_max *mreq)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html