From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 07:01:05 -0400

quoted text
> On Friday 11 July 2008 6:45:49 am Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> > Currently, we are trying to place the information from the kernel to
> > 1, 2, 3 and 4 pages sequentially. These pages are allocated via slab.
> > Though, from the slab point of view steps 3 and 4 are equivalent on
> > most architectures. So, lets skip 3 pages attempt.
> >
> > By the way, should we switch from .doit to .dumpit interface here?
> > The amount of data seems quite big for me.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
> 
> I'll add my ack to this patch because your logic sounds reasonable and 
> I'm glad to have more eyes on the code :)
> 
> However, I not a big fan of converting this from a .doit to a .dumpit 
> interface because this would cause userspace breakage.  We could 
> potentially do both for backwards compatibility but I have no idea if 
> it is possible to have both interfaces available at the same time.  One 
> thing to keep in mind before diving into your favorite editor is that 
> I've yet to hear of there being a problem with this NetLabel command 
> and the .doit interface, we may want to hold off to see if it becomes 
> an issue.
> 
> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>

I've applied Denis's patch.

Also, I agree with him that a .dumpit conversion might be
entirely appropriate.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html