Re: bridging with gre tunnel

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Philip Craig <philipc@...>
Cc: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@...>, <bridge@...>, <netdev@...>
Date: Monday, July 14, 2008 - 5:13 am

Philip Craig wrote:

I agree.


This would be my preferred approach. There are other drivers that use a 
netdev to do some encap/decap processing on packets which are then 
passed on to another driver, e.g. macvlan, and it works well.

-- 
James Chapman
Katalix Systems Ltd
http://www.katalix.com
Catalysts for your Embedded Linux software development

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
bridging with gre tunnel, Timo Teräs, (Fri Jul 11, 2:30 am)
Re: bridging with gre tunnel, Philip Craig, (Sun Jul 13, 8:41 pm)
Re: bridging with gre tunnel, Timo Teräs, (Mon Jul 14, 3:25 am)
Re: bridging with gre tunnel, Philip Craig, (Mon Jul 14, 4:44 am)
Re: bridging with gre tunnel, Herbert Xu, (Mon Jul 14, 7:45 am)
Re: [Bridge] bridging with gre tunnel, Patrick McHardy, (Mon Jul 14, 8:15 am)
Re: [Bridge] bridging with gre tunnel, Herbert Xu, (Mon Jul 14, 8:20 am)
Re: bridging with gre tunnel, Timo Teräs, (Mon Jul 14, 5:44 am)
Re: bridging with gre tunnel, James Chapman, (Mon Jul 14, 5:13 am)
Re: [Bridge] bridging with gre tunnel, Stephen Hemminger, (Fri Jul 11, 3:07 pm)