Re: bridging with gre tunnel

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Philip Craig <philipc@...>
Cc: <bridge@...>, <netdev@...>
Date: Monday, July 14, 2008 - 3:25 am

Philip Craig wrote:

There is an essential difference in this patch compared to the one
I referred to. This patch adds a new way to create GRE devices which
results in ethernet style device whereas the older patch modifies
transmit and receive paths to detect packets coming from bridging
code and does not need userland changes at all.

I kind of like the fact that userland tools work as-is and that
I don't need any special flags for the GRE tunnel creation. However
your patch does look way cleaner.

Any comments on what the solution to merged in should look like?

- Timo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
bridging with gre tunnel, Timo Teräs, (Fri Jul 11, 2:30 am)
Re: bridging with gre tunnel, Philip Craig, (Sun Jul 13, 8:41 pm)
Re: bridging with gre tunnel, Timo Teräs, (Mon Jul 14, 3:25 am)
Re: bridging with gre tunnel, Philip Craig, (Mon Jul 14, 4:44 am)
Re: bridging with gre tunnel, Herbert Xu, (Mon Jul 14, 7:45 am)
Re: [Bridge] bridging with gre tunnel, Patrick McHardy, (Mon Jul 14, 8:15 am)
Re: [Bridge] bridging with gre tunnel, Herbert Xu, (Mon Jul 14, 8:20 am)
Re: bridging with gre tunnel, Timo Teräs, (Mon Jul 14, 5:44 am)
Re: bridging with gre tunnel, James Chapman, (Mon Jul 14, 5:13 am)
Re: [Bridge] bridging with gre tunnel, Stephen Hemminger, (Fri Jul 11, 3:07 pm)