On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:02:17PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:Isn't this needed for the definition of struct work and schedule_work()? Don't we still need this for udelay()? And this for dma_map_single, etc. I didn't bother to check all the other includes being removed, but it seems you may have been a bit overly aggressive. -Dale -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Joe Perches | [PATCH 143/148] include/asm-x86/vm86.h: checkpatch cleanups - formatting only |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: Back to the future. |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Trent Piepho | [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
